Selected Bibliography by Article
Article 7.3.17 Bibliography (1) A party may terminate the contract where the failure of the other party to perform an obligation under the contract amounts to a fundamental non-performance.
(2) In determining whether a failure to perform an obligation amounts to a fundamental non-performance regard shall be had, in particular, to whether
(a) the non-performance substantially deprives the aggrieved party of what it was entitled to expect under the contract unless the other party did not foresee and could not reasonably have foreseen such result;
(b) strict compliance with the obligation which has not been performed is of essence under the contract;
(c) the non-performance is intentional or reckless;
(d) the non-performance gives the aggrieved party reason to believe that it cannot rely on the other party"s future performance;
(e) the non-performing party will suffer disproportionate loss as a result of the preparation or performance if the contract is terminated.
(3) In the case of delay the aggrieved party may also terminate the contract if the other party fails to perform before the time allowed it under Article 7.1.5 has expired.
|BONELL M.J.||A ‘Global’ arbitration decided on the basis of the UNIDROIT Principles: In re Andersen Consulting Business Unit Member Firms v. Arthur Andersen Business Unit Member Firms and Andersen Worldwide Société Coopérative||17 Arbitration International 2001, 249-261|
|BRIDGE M.||The CISG and the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts||Uniform Law Review = Revue de droit uniforme, vol. 19 n. 4 (2014), pp. 623-642|
|HUBER, P.||Comment on Arts.7.3.1-7.3.6||in S.VOGENAUER - J.KLEINHEISTERKAMP (eds.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC), Oxford University Press, New York, 2009, pp.815-863.|
|HUBER, P.||Comment to Arts. 7.3.1-7.3.7 (Termination)||in S. VOGENAUER (ed.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC), 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015, 916-971|
|LEIN E.||La portée pratique des Principes UNIDROIT: une perspective allemande||in: Cashin-Ritaine E. / Lein E. (eds.), The UNIDROIT Principles 2004 - Their Impact on Contractual Practice, Jurisprudence and Codification (ISDC Colloquium - 8/9 June 2006), Schulthess, Zürich 2007, pp. 169-188|
|NGUYEN, M. H.||Les Principes UNIDROIT: Jurisprudence et expériences pour le Vietnam||Revue de droit des affaires internationales/International Business Law, no. 5/2005, pp. 619-636|
|VENEZIANO A. / FINAZZI AGRO' E.||The use of the UNIDROIT Principles in order to interpret or supplement national contract law||GRAZIADEI M. (ed.), Annuario di diritto comparato e di studi legislativi, 2018, 39-62|
Total Bibliography in the database 937