|
||||||||||||||||||
| Keywords | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
| PARTIES' AGREEMENT ON APPLICATION OF CISG DURING PROCEEDINGS
INTERPRETATION OF CISG - NEED FOR UNIFORM APPLICATION (ART. 7(1) CISG) - RECOURSE TO GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CISG (ART. 7(2) CISG) - RECOURSE TO FOREIGN CASE LAW AND SCHOLARLY WRITING - RECOURSE TO CONVENTION'S LEGISLATIVE HISTORY NON CONFORMITY OF GOODS – FITNESS FOR ORDINARY USE - INTERPRETATION OF STANDARD OF NON-CONFORMITY (ART. 35 (2) (A) CISG) – MERCHANTABILITY TEST AND AVERAGE QUALITY TEST EXCLUDED - REASONABLE QUALITY STANDARD ACCEPTED - BURDEN OF PROOF ON BUYER BUYER’S RIGHT TO SUSPEND PERFORMANCE - INSTALMENT CONTRACT WHERE INSTALMENTS ARE NOT INTERDEPENDENT - APPLICABILITY OF ART. 71(1) CISG - GOOD GROUNDS THAT FUTURE DELIVERIES MAY BE NON CONFORMING BUYER'S RIGHT TO SUSPEND PERFORMANCE - IMMEDIATE NOTICE TO SELLER (ART. 71(3)) - NO EVIDENCE THEREOF - SELLER'S RIGHT TO DAMAGES |